If you’re anything like most of the rest of the world, you’re always busy. Right?
We tend to make time for what is most important to us, but we never seem to be able to achieve everything we want to accomplish. Sure there are things you would like to learn if you had the time to train or study. For example, playing a musical instrument or speaking (another) foreign language are probably popular bucket list items.
Personally managing your hard-earned wealth may be another. However, determining if you should manage your investments boils down to three simple criteria: time, training and temperament. If you don’t have the time to manage your investments, then it doesn’t matter if you have the training or even-keeled temperament.
Perhaps you’ve studied and understand the “how” of managing your investments, but you don’t have the ability to make unemotional, rational decisions. In these cases, you would (hopefully) realize you need the help of a professional.
Who’s for You?
What criteria do you use to select a financial adviser? With so many “advisers,” how do you select the best one for your unique situation? While there are many different attributes you want to consider, one in particular is notable: whether the adviser is legally obligated to look out for your best interests.
There are many professions that do not require this standard of care. These include some of the largest financial transactions you might encounter: selling your home, automotive purchases and life insurance, to name a few. In these industries, the sales person or agent may not work in a fiduciary capacity.
In other words, s/he does not legally need to act in your best interests. This can be true in the financial services industry, as well.
Suppose you’re meeting with your financial adviser, and she suggests you invest your $500,000 IRA into an annuity. She explains all of the features of the product, along with the “bells and whistles.” You say, “This sounds great. Let’s purchase this product.”
But was this in your best interests simply because your financial adviser suggested it? Possibly not. Or, perhaps, your life insurance agent suggests you “invest” in a variable universal life insurance policy “to protect your family.” Is this in your best interests? Maybe, but maybe not.
There are two very different standards when it comes to obtaining financial advice: the Suitability Standard and the Fiduciary Standard.
In today’s financial advising industry, the Fiduciary Standard is as important as ever. In the second quarter of 2016, the Department of Labor (DOL) released new rules stating that financial advisers must perform certain due diligences to help ensure that a client’s 401(k) plan assets and individual retirement accounts (IRAs) are invested prudently.
Most consumers have no idea about these rules and, therefore, they believe their financial adviser is looking out for their best interests. This is certainly not the case, but the difference undeniably matters.
It is important to recognize that advisers can earn their income using either a commission-based or fee-based compensation system. The former is where the Suitability Standard falls, meaning the adviser sells you an investment product, such as an annuity.
This annuity might be suitable for you, but you might not need it financially, because you already have a healthy income stream during retirement, due to pensions. The adviser can make a healthy commission up-front from the sale of this annuity, but what incentive does he then have to monitor your account or provide you with exceptional service? He has already been compensated.
The latter is what the industry is shifting towards, and goes hand-in-hand with the Fiduciary Standard. When a firm is fee-based, it is incentivized to provide ongoing service, day after day, that is cost efficient, and that correlate with your goals and tolerance for risk.
The bottom line is that choosing an adviser following the Suitability Standard versus one that follows the Fiduciary Standard does matter. You worked hard for your money, and trusting someone to manage it for you can be unsettling, but it can provide you with greater comfort knowing that you are working with an adviser who truly is acting in your best interests.
With all of this in mind, you may find it prudent to discuss the difference between these standards with your financial adviser and determine if your current circumstances are right for you.
Nicholas Ibello is wealth manager and associate vice president; and Gary S. Williams, CFP, CRPC, AIF, is the president and founder; of Williams Asset Management, in Columbia. They can be reached at 410-740-0220 or at Nick@WilliamsAsset.com or Gary@WilliamsAsset.com.